

Although there's a little more than two weeks left in this project, there is still much work to do to ensure a really successful community meeting and to prepare final project description and analysis for my host contacts.
SCENARIO I: A single mother turns the other way as Mr. X picks her 10 year old daughter up and takes her away for a few hours. This happens a couple of times a week. Each time the child returns, she has money to provide to mom. This is too frequent of an event....the only reasoning..."income is needed to supplement the household."
SCENARIO II: A married woman wants a divorce. Why? She's been with her husband since she was 15 (he was 19). She is now 34. He is now 38. They have 4 children. 2 are girls. They are now 18 and 13 years old. Dad, their biological father, molested the oldest starting at the age of 13 thru 16. Mom filed charges. The case got adjourned and adjourned and adjourned. When she went to court the 4th time, the case file(remember they are all hand-written here) is mysteriously lost. So since there's no file, there's no case unless mom wants to start all over. Exhausted and out of money, mom gives up on pressing charges. She takes him back. Then, to her horror, she finds out that Dad also had sex with the youngest from 5-8 years of age.
SCENARIO III: Headline in the Local Paper......"Brothers Walk Free as Sister Admits to Seducing Them!
In all these cases, the greatest hope would be that the prosecution would go after the male perpetrators and send a STRONG message to future perps that the behavior is not only legally unacceptable, but socially looked down upon, emotionally damaging and will simply not be tolerated. Because sexual assaults are a special kind of crime that takes away the human dignity and self-esteem/worth of the victim, it is important to have specially trained police officers, social workers, and prosecutors who are well versed in handling these type of cases.
This project has a long way to go before it comes to full fruition. However, we are on the right track though. More updates later.
Last night, I learned never to arrive at a government meeting on time. The meeting was scheduled for 6p at the Dangriga Town Hall, however, it did not start til 6:45p. The meeting was meant to be a "public consultation" on behalf of the government (required by law whenever any type of proposed change is to be made to the Belizean Constitution). Long before 7p this public consultation quickly turned into a "public confrontation". I attended for Attorney Moore as the petroleum issue could effect land rights vested currently in her clients, the indigenous Mayan community in the southern Toledo District of Belize.
A little background before going further: The PUP (People's United Party) governed Belize for the past 10 years. The UDP (United Democratic Party), in February 2008, won big over the PUP's on a message of "Change". People felt disenfranchised by the PUP's. They felt corruption had overtaken the PUP leaders and that a few leaders at the top were benefitting while the people suffered.
The newly-elected Ministers of the UDP Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Reps came to Dangriga to explain the proposed Constitutional changes. They hoped for good response. They were met by about 90 citizens who were wholly opposed to a major proposed change. In all, there were 22 changes being proposed. Only 1 was discussed (and with intensity) during the two and a half hours I stayed. Some of the changes being requested by the new goverment included;
However, in the middle of all these innocuous items was one that became the whole topic of the night....a provision to the Constitution that would vest ALL PROPERTY RIGHTS in PETROLEUM and MINERALS in the Government of Belize ALONE. The explanation given by the Ministers was that the proposed change is as clear as read....."All petroleum and minerals belong to the government, which in turn, the government is the people and therefore the people benefit. So you the people, not any one individual property owner, will profit." In the midst of this somewhat idealistic explanation, there were hard to ignore grunts and diplomatically held back murmurs that were not withheld when the microphone was finally opened for questioning.
In addition, that amendment also states that not only do land owners have no right to benefit from petroleums/minerals, but that no citizen can sue the government over any matter concerning petroleum or minerals. One of the ministers asked, "Can't we all agree that the petroleum and minerals found on Belizean land should be for the Government and People of Belize? If we all believe this, then why would we want to challenge it in court?"
I could be absolutely wrong, but I got a sense as the evening wore on that if a citizen/land owner disagreed with this passionate, patriotic argument the Ministers were trying (but failed) to make, the people would be considered "unpatriotic."
The government attorneys on hand tried to clarify as the crowd became more and more disenchanted. "Maybe it would be helpful for us to remember that the Petroleum Act of 2000 provides a 5% royalty to landowners on petroleum found. So there will be some compensation according to the Petroleum Act." A male audience member stood to respond, "Doesn't the Constitution trump any law that contravenes it?" The attorney hesitantly replied, "that is correct sir." The man said, "then if the Constitution says that ALL petroleum belongs ONLY to the government and that I can't sue over it, then wouldn't that clearly indicate that the Petroleum Act would be null & void." No follow-up response came from the Government attorneys.
The real argument made by the people last nite was "Equitable distribution of benefits for land owners derived from oil production." Although the discussion was heated, I saw democracy in progress! The people here are no longer willing to be complacent and just accept whatever party leaders tell them. They asked the hard questions. They did it with respect and dignity, although you could clearly tell they were heavily steamed. The thing that disappointed me was how the government leaders seemed to try to dictate to the audience how they should perceive the issue and demoralized dissenters by saying "Maybe you don't understand" or "there are people here tonight that are misinformed and will try to convince you against these proposals".
A female audience member stated, "how can you expect us to rubber stamp your proposal when you have attached 22 changes in one big Whop and did not provide enough time for the public to educate ourselves on how these changes will effect us individually or as a country. There was not even a notice in the paper about this meeting. We had to hear word of mouth." An elderly gentleman stood at the microphone to say that it was very presumptuous on the part of the new government to assume that such changes to the Constitution could be railroaded through. He admonished the Ministers that the people are the one's who put them in power and that the people would never forget and would remember it five years from now when elections roll back around.
As I dismissed myself from the meeting, a bystander said to another attendee outside of the hall looking in.....This party of "Change" is pulling the same tricks as the old government, and they've only been in office four months."
However, in defense (but not necessarily support) of the government ....if I may, after researching a bit....in 2006 commercial oil was first discovered in Belize in the Spanish Lookout village. This was an amazing discovery in light of the fact that oil drilling has been occurring for decades in Belize by all the big boy foreign oil companies with no significant finds. As the Constitution and laws are now, foreign companies and the landowners are profiting big time, while the govt only gets a small cut for its people. The governments argument, although not made as eloquently or convincingly as one could imagine, is that foreigners and one or two families should not be the sole profiteers of Belize's natural minerals and oils. In fact, "the people" of Belize should benefit rather than 2 or 3 individuals. The landowners argument is "fine, let the government gain the majority of the profit to better infrastructure, provide health care and education to all..etc......but don't cut landowners, who have cared for the land for years, out altogether. Atleast ensure that the 5% royalty remains."
This is a passage from my hand-written journal while in Belize shortly after Hillary Clinton gave her exit speech on Saturday, June 7, 2008.
DEAR JOURNAL:
This is a historic day in American history and quite frankly, I don’t think it has all sunk in just yet. Maybe its because I'm sitting here in Belize right now and just feel a bit removed from the process. I sat glued by the T.V. Tuesday night as McCain, Clinton and Obama, sequentially, gave their June 3rd primary election night speeches. I was so proud of the dignity and grace in which Obama stood tall in “his moment” (NO, “our moment”!) as being the first African American to have the democratic nomination in hand, as indicated by the clinching of more than the required delegates. I was equally proud today, as I sat and listened to Hillary Clinton’s endorsement of Obama and the generosity shown in the ultimate effort of unifying the Democratic Party to the road to the White House. But it just still has not sunk in quite yet. I know it’s real. But can it really be that in the first decade of the 21st Century that a white woman and a black man have, TOGETHER, totally changed the landscape of politics as we once knew it. Something has definitely occurred that will be talked about and written about for many, many years to come. And to think, we had the fortunate opportunity in this generation of witnessing it all unfold!
I admit, up front, that I have been a strong Obama supporter all along. So needless to say, I certainly was, am and will always be very proud of Senator Barack Obama’s accomplishment of gaining the Democratic nomination for President of the United States of America. (that felt so good just saying it all long like that!) However, in all honesty, I really believed Hillary would win based on a number of reasons; more experience, possibly better connected, and the old stand by - "it's time for a woman in the White House!!" But, there is still a tremendous sense of loss as I come to terms with the fact that Hillary will not be the nominee. However, I don’t think I’m alone.
Many African American women, in particular, during this primary election campaign were placed in an extremely peculiar position. Having a strong allegiance and connection to both immutable characteristics; a possibility of Clinton becoming the first female president and Obama as the first African American president in the greatest country on earth, all in the same party and primary election, and being asked to choose between the two was an extremely difficult assignment. On one hand, black women understand and connect strongly with all the many struggles that women as a whole had to, have to and will continue to have to fight for as it relates to voting rights, equal pay, glass ceilings and more as we strive to reach our fullest potentials in all areas of life. On the other hand, there is an unfathomably long history and heritage of slavery, Jim Crow laws (Plessy v. Ferguson), educational/political/social discrimination, and the fight for civil rights in which black women throughout the country unite so deeply with Obama. To be asked to choose between the two was just an overwhelming request and experience. Many African American females, including myself, made the decision to “do no harm” to Hillary Clinton while supporting Barack Obama.
Hillary’s speech today, should have lifted every woman’s spirit, drive and dedication (even those who supported Obama) to become what ever they want to be in life, no matter what age, race, nationality or cultural background. The dignity and grace in which she bowed out of the race will remain with me. I could feel the hurt and the pain of a long and hard fought battle lost. But I could also hear the hopes and the dreams of the future for a country in which it will no longer be “an occasion” for a woman to head up a majority of major corporations, become governor of states country-wide, and yes, even one day become the President of the United States of America.
In speaking with Dangrigan women about what they think about Clinton’s race and Obama’s democratic nominee win, there is no doubt in my mind that what happens in the U.S. many times sets the stage for what can happen in other countries. Hillary's accomplishment (although falling a bit short) and Obama's win certainly have impacted and seemingly empowered women and citizens of Dangriga. People are talking about it all over town, every where you go. A man that I see quite frequently yelled to me while walking to the internet cafe in downtown Dangriga after hearing Hillary's speech, "Hey Man, whata' bout Obama!" with great enthusiasm.
One woman in high position in Belize explained to me that the U.S. does not realize that what it does, impacts people in Belize (and for that matter, the world). For example, she mentioned that as all the raids on illegal immigrants in the U.S. escalates and are televised, she has also seen an increased lack of regard and discretion for immigrants here. Although immigrants (legal or illegal) are afforded due process in any deportation matters in the states, here in Belize, she explained, they do not have the same “American justice”. In Belize, if a person can not readily demonstrate status because of language barriers or for whatever reason, they can automatically be deported to their country of origin the same day. Just in case you were wondering, migrants to Belize come predominantly from Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico for work in the citrus and banana fields.
So, just as Hillary Clinton has inspired American women to fight for, strive for and conquer their dreams, she has also had an inspirational effect on Belizean women of all ages. I honestly can’t believe that I am (we are) so privileged in this generation to experience such historic times that will have long lasting affects both nationally and internationally.